Published 2007
by Palgrave Macmillan in Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York .
Written in English
Edition Notes
Includes index.
Statement | edited by Colin Farrelly and Lawrence B Solum. |
Contributions | Farrelly, Colin Patrick., Solum, Lawrence. |
Classifications | |
---|---|
LC Classifications | K246 .V57 2007 |
The Physical Object | |
Pagination | p. cm. |
ID Numbers | |
Open Library | OL16650897M |
ISBN 10 | 0230552897 |
LC Control Number | 2007048302 |
This book is the first authoritative text on virtue jurisprudence - the belief that the final end of law is not to maximize preference satisfaction or protect certain rights and privileges, but to promote human flourishing. Scholars of law, philosophy and politics illustrate here the value of the virtue ethics tradition to modern legal theory. This book is the first authoritative text on virtue jurisprudence - the belief that the final end of law is not to maximize preference satisfaction or protect certain rights and privileges, but to promote human flourishing. Scholars of law, philosophy and politics illustrate here the value of the virtue ethics tradition to modern legal theory/5(2). Recently, legal scholars have brought renewed attention to the question of what modern law may have to learn from Aristotle specifically, and from virtue ethics generally. This new virtue jurisprudence movement is situated in the debate over normative legal theory, yet it has taken on a decidedly practical question: What would happen if virtue ethics were transplanted into normative . This book is the first authoritative text on virtue jurisprudence - the belief that the final end of law is not to maximize preference satisfaction or protect certain rights and privileges, but to Scholars of law, philosophy and politics illustrate here the value of the virtue ethics tradition to modern legal theory.
Virtue Jurisprudence: A Virtue-Centered Theory of Judging This book is the first authoritative text on virtue jurisprudence - the belief that the final end of law is not to maximize preference satisfaction or protect certain rights and privileges, but to promote human flourishing. Abstract. This book is the first authoritative text on virtue jurisprudence - the belief that the final end of law is not to maximize preference satisfaction or protect certain rights and privileges, but to promote human flourishing. Scholars of law, philosophy and politics illustrate here the value of the virtue ethics tradition to modern legal s: Lawrence B. Solum, Georgetown . Virtue jurisprudence - Wikipedia This book is the first authoritative text on virtue jurisprudence - the belief that the final end of law is not to maximize preference Page 2/ Online Library Virtue Jurisprudence satisfaction or protect certain rights and privileges, but to. Virtue Jurisprudence: C. Farrelly: Buy Virtue Jurisprudence by Colin Farrelly, Lawrence B. Solum (ISBN: ) from Amazon's Book Store. Free UK delivery on eligible orders. (PDF) Virtue Jurisprudence: An Aretaic Theory of Law In the philosophy of law, virtue jurisprudence is the name given to theories of law.
For example, Lawrence Solum has already written of the effect of virtue jurisprudence on some areas of the law, (4) and together with Colin Farrelly, has called for a return to the principles of virtue jurisprudence as the basis of law. (5) At best, this project is in utero. (6) Virtue ethics is . This book is a collection of essays examining the role of virtue in general jurisprudence as well as in specific areas of the law. Part I puts together a number of papers discussing various philosophical aspects of an approach to law and adjudication based on the virtues. Advocates of virtue jurisprudence put primary emphasis on aretaic concepts rather than on duties or consequences. Aretaic concepts are, on this view, crucial for explaining law and adjudication. This book is a collection of essays examining the role of virtue in general jurisprudence . Abstract. "Virtue jurisprudence" is a normative and explanatory theory of law that utilizes the resources of virtue ethics to answer the central questions of legal theory. The main focus of the essay is the development of a virtue-centered theory of judging. The exposition of the theory begins with exploration of defects in judicial character such as corruption and incompetence.